Thursday, December 3, 2015

A Sort of Salute

So I'm feeling a little insecure. There are officially three days until exams at my university. Am I nervous? "No" was my answer until my class started presenting final projects. Natalie's was awesome from Tuesday, and it inspired me to work hard on mine. But then everyone who went today impressed me to the point I became nervous.

 
I'm still nervous. It was like everyone became a teacher and knew exactly what future students would want. It makes sense: we're all students ourselves. And while I think we all enjoy the class as it already it, we are individuals; we want to change things that will appeal more to us. For example, some presenters wanted to use Tumblr as platforms for the classroom other than Blackboard; making the class online. Others (I'm sorry I don't remember who went--it's been a long week) created whole new syllabuses with inventive new projects I never would have thought of. Everyone was super creative; I want to take those classes!
 
I might sound like a nervous wreck, but I'm actually not. I'm just really impressed with everyone. I knew they were smart people--everyone in my classes are smart-- but people never cease to amaze me. And while I'm confident I won't do badly on the project, since time and again when I thought and others have thought we would do terrible we actually do great, there's still a nagging I'll be all
 
 
while everyone else is like 
 
I'm probably worrying over nothing. Even so, you, my dear classmates, are awesome! I salute you.
 






Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Anything and Everything

My professor told us to make a post with advice about what kind of writing freshmen should do. It didn't me very long after analyzing the kind of writing I enjoy and do for class. My answer: everything.

I'm a Writing Studies track, which is, basically, a type of English degree where you learn to do all sorts of writing relative to the workplace and academia.  Though most of my classes have to with rhetoric and business writing or networking through writing in some shape or form, I have taken a creative writing class and several literature classes. Taking creative writing classes is mainly a break from more formal writing, and for my own goals to be a published fiction author someday. The literature classes have been for major requirements and for fun, too.

While I have enjoyed all of my English classes, I have learned a LOT from them too. Creative writing can be a great way to express creativity in ways you can't when writing formally while also teaching you how to express subtle creativity when writing more formally. Creative writing taught me how to put my own voice in a professional, formal text without sounding like I'm talking to my best friend.

 

Literature classes, no matter how much they get labelled as "useless" and "waste of my time", will teach you to think critically and quite a bit about the world. For one, you can't go back in history, and from high school most people associate history classes with boredom. Taking a literature class will teach you tons about history as you read a text and analyze why an author wrote about something and why it is significant; literature reveals more about a people, a time, and culture than most anything else. Literature will also teach you a lot about life, and, let's be honest, college is about learning how to navigate life so we have a better chance in it when we leave the safety of the university campus.

Rhetorical classes or professional writing classes will teach you how to communicate in the work place, which is where all college students hope to get to someday (I assume). Admittedly, they can be a little less fun than creative writing and literature classes--not to say those are easier, because they aren't-- but rhetoric and business writing will prevent you from sending a email that represents a Facebook post to the CEO of the company you work for. They will teach you how to craft text that will be the most successful, whether it be an essay, speech, presentation, etc. You will learn how to move an audience the way you want to; how to use all sorts of awesome rhetorical tools with Greek names I can't pronounce half the time; and how to use all sorts of mediums to present an idea, amongst other things.

So, dear freshmen, take writing classes of all kinds. They will make the well-rounded citizens older generations hope you will be when you graduate. You'll be able to write anything and everything if you take the time and effort to learn to.

Monday, November 30, 2015

Researching vs. Reading

I'm a huge Tolkien fan. In case you didn't realize, I absolutely adore LOTR and The Hobbit.
I can quote whole conversations from both the LOTR trilogy and the new Hobbit trilogy films. I can spout out random facts no one but other Tolkien fans care to hear. It's intense and I don't regret my obsession one bit.

Does this mean I've read every shred of text Tolkien had written and was later dug up and edited by his son? . . .  No. I'm ashamed to say but also a little uncaring to claim that I've only read two of Tolkien's works: The Hobbit and The Silmarillion. The first most people have at least heard, the second, not so much. Part of the reason being The Hobbit and LOTR are the only truly completed works of Tolkien set in Middle Earth. Everything else was published posthumously and by his son, who edited and tried his best to piece together chunks of text that his father had left behind. The other bit of reason being that Tolkien couldn't make up his mind about certain characters and plot points; he changed the backstories of some characters several times, leaving them unfinished when he died in 1973.

Okay, there's my lecture on Tolkien for the day. See what obsession does? Anyways, I have not read The Lord of the Rings books. I grew up with Peter Jackson's magnificent films; I loved them ever since I was a kid and I am determined to have my nieces and nephew love them too. I still watch them on a regular basis. I dreamed and made up stories where I was the main character in Middle Earth as a kid. You would think this love of LOTR and Middle Earth would have gotten me to read the books as soon as I was able, and I did try. I was in the seventh grade, and did not fully understand LOTR. I didn't really begin to understand the epic until I entered high school. So, when I was twelve or whatever age you are in the seventh grade, I didn't even get through the first book of the trilogy.

And I've a tried a few times since. I never get past the first few chapters of The Fellowship. Why? For one, have you seen the actual books? They're mini bibles in shape and detail. That's another reason: detail. Tolkien writes detail like nothing you've ever seen. He spends several paragraphs and/or even several pages describing one scene and or thing. Info dumps everywhere. I appreciate this a lot more as a young adult than as a kid; a twelve year old cares more about the action than the masterfully crafted sentences and beautiful prose. Despite this new appreciation, I find myself regarding the trilogy and other Tolkien works with caution.

The main reason is not the thick plotline, size of the books (even though I've read HUGE books before), or lack of understanding. It's laziness. That may seem shocking, since I've obviously put a lot and time and effort to participating and learning about Middle Earth.
 
But the medium I've used to learn so much about Middle Earth, its inhabitants and its stories is the Internet.
 
I'm not here to rant against the web; I might in another post, but not here. Even so, I can't ignore the fact that the internet and the infinite amount of information it makes accessible has a huge impact on my reading life. With the internet, I can delve deeper into a fictional world and join others. With the internet, I can discover things I never would have otherwise. Still, all that information found in Tolkien's books can be found online. On several sites. By many people who are more obsessed than I am (no, seriously). Anything I wanted to know about The Hobbit and The Silmarillion can be found on the web. If there were things I wanted to know more about or needed clarified from those two books, I searched it in Google, Youtube, and specific Tolkien websites.
 
I already know quite a bit about Tolkien's other works; I've spoiled myself silly. And I feel kind of guilty, especially when I get with other Tolkien enthusiasts. Does this mean I'll disconnect the web and read the five or so other works by Tolkien before I connect it again?
 
 
I am going to continue to obsess over and learn about Middle Earth with the internet, but I'm determined to pick up more of Tolkien's works. I hope I succeed in reading all of LOTR, I really do, but the internet may prove just too easy for me to ignore. 


Saturday, November 21, 2015

All Tweets Tell a Story

I'm not sure what I just read. Jennifer Egan's Twitter story called Black Box seems, at least in my opinion, a spy thriller that took place in an alternative 1950s America. Not sure why, but from how the status of women was described, i.e. they were doing it all for their husbands and country, it sounds like something from the fifties or WWII. And the several beauties with their "Designated Mate" (I really hate that) sounds like a harem. From what I understand, it seems like they got a bunch of brave, patriotic housewives and trained them to be minimal undercover agents posing as mistresses. I guess the reason for this squad is to infiltrate a network of cruel and powerful men who are doing things that the US does not like by having them be playthings for the cruel and powerful men.

I have mixed feelings about this. It's hard to tell what the world is actually like since Egan didn't give much details. She couldn't because the story would have gone on and on for months. Formatting the story as tweets was rather genius; except that there's a lot of white space that isn't filled in. We can't know for sure what the world this woman is in. I wrote above that I believe its an alternative USA in the 1950s, but who knows? It could be a future US where the country is no longer a superpower. Tweeting the story leaves room for many different interpretations and a lot of head-scratching as to what the in and outs of the world are.

What I really enjoyed about the tweets was that they were short. Sometimes, it's nice to read something naked of detail instead of having to process all the information of description. Granted, the space between each sentence and amidst sentences when a new tweet has to be made was a tad annoying. On the other hand, the simplicity of the format made it quick to read and with the lack of detail, I didn't feel bogged down. The tweets also gave the ability to easily share and comment on specific parts of the story. Thanks to the digital age, fans can connect with authors in ways never before seen. Still, it's hard to comment and discuss with others the exact quote of a story unless you all have the same exact copies.

I liked the story; it was thought-provoking. The tweeting format was refreshing, albeit a little strange.

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Sharing is Caring

Lately, and for no reason in particular, I've been thinking about how the social media thing is possible. I know, pretty deep. But seriously, how is it possible? Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Tumblr, Reddit, YouTube, and other social media sites wouldn't be possible if it wasn't for one thing: sharing.

We're social creatures: from time immemorial we have been more successful in a group than alone. Why do TV characters freak out when their friends leave them in an unknown land? Because the character know he/she could easily be a snack for a hungry animal.

 

When our ancestors weren't running away from saber-toothed tigers or other human beings of different clans, they were sharing with each other. The only way people can learn things is from others. And the only way others can teach us is through sharing. Teaching is sharing knowledge. Our ancestors shared knowledge with one another, thus helping us evolve from living with only a thatched roof between our head and the sky to living in skyscrapers fully equipped with running water, plumbing, heating and air conditioning, and internet--which was made by and for the military, not the public. We wouldn't have the internet and any social media without the military (another thing to thank them for!). Because they let entrepreneurs and engineers develop it, we have the internet we know today (that's not a great summary of the history of the internet, but you get it).

But why is social media so damn popular?  As I said before I went off on a tangent, we are social creatures. We want to know and care about others, but even more so, we want to be known and cared about in return. 


Social media has made sharing and caring about others a hell of a lot easier than ever before. I wasn't alive in World War II, but I'd venture to say that Americans didn't care too much about the rest of the world's issues until the issues were shoved into America's face via Pearl Harbor. I'm not saying nobody cared or that 1940s Americans were heartless, but its hard to really care when the information isn't readily accessible. Before the internet, the world was still a relatively large place that had to be explored and shared slowly. Long-distance communication was primarily letters. Its hard to be upset about a country being invaded when you're an ocean away. Today, millions of people can care about a single kid with cancer more quickly and honestly with one click of a button.

It is the sharing that makes social media. There's no point in having an account on Twitter or Facebook if you're not going to use it. Using it means following others and being followed. It means sharing bits of your life with the hope someone will care; it's the hope that someone will have something grand or interesting to say so you can join in. It's the hope that maybe we aren't as boring and insignificant in this wide world to another person as we think ourselves to be.

Thursday, November 12, 2015

The Best I Have

Recently in class we were asked to blog about our favorite piece of writing that we were most proud of. Since I came to writing in my last year of high school, I do not have a lot of complete papers--that's actually a poor excuse but anyways . . . I had to think about what my favorite piece of writing is; the one that elicits a lot of preening on my part when I think about it.

Eventually, I came to a short essay that I had to write for a British Lit class. It was supposed to be based on Wordsworth's concept of "spots of time", or memories that had a huge impact on a person's life. It took a little bit at the time to decide on a spot of time, considering lots of things can impact a life. But I finally settled on the memory that occurred overseas, in the mountains of Germany.

The summer before I turned seventeen, I went to Germany with my parents. Though I have many fond memories of the experience, one stuck with me particularly. I wrote about my day and a half in a tiny town in the middle of the Black Forest on top of a massive and steep hill. I had just finished a very rough year in high school and was relieved to not just be out of the school, but away from it all with an ocean between. It was gorgeous on top of that hill (I can't remember the town's name). Since I love to walk, I got up early and took a long stroll all through the town and the walking path that zig-zagged all over it.

Since my writing was supposed to reflect Wordsworth, who lives up to his name and uses very flowery, dreamy language with tons of imagery, I had to conjure up as many details as I could. I remembered a lot from that walk, but some I did elaborate. We also had to write how the memory impacted our life, and my explanation was honest and about mental health. It was not cheesy, but like most writers, I doubted myself. I couldn't help but feel it was kind of pathetic when I turned it in.

I never believed it was bad; just not great. When my professor handed it back a week later, I was shocked and thrilled from my toes to the top of my head to see an A. She wrote that I really understood Wordsworth and my writing reflected his very well. I was ecstatic! I have always done well on papers, but for some reason that was the best experience I have ever had. Perhaps it had to do with the fact that someone found my personal writing interesting and actually well-crafted that thrilled me so much. I hadn't ever had someone hint I was a good writer because I simply wrote about a personal experience and did so by imitating a famous poet. I mean, come on, what writer doesn't want to be able to write similarly and well to a famous author?

The essays sits in my folder quietly now. I pull it out when I need to smile or a boost of confidence. I bet another piece will replace it eventually, but for now it's the best I have.

Monday, November 9, 2015

Facebook Breakup

In Chapter Ten of Baron's A Better Pencil, it is stated that "Facebook and Myspace remain the go-to sites for a full service meet and greet" (183). This was published in 2008, when I believe Twitter was still relatively new. Things have changed--at least in my opinion.

Facebook is not as popular as it once was just a few years ago. The four years I was in high school were definitely recorded and talked about on Facebook. I didn't do that as much as my peers, but I got Facebook because all of my friends had it. A few years later I discovered Twitter, and quite honestly, I like it much, much better than Facebook. I've come to the point where I am seriously considering a breakup with the site.
I never thought I would. Believe me: I have spent countless hours browsing Facebook when I could actually be doing something productive. Since entering college and growing up a little, I've realized I don't like wasting time on Facebook anymore. I don't like spending hours on any website anymore. Most sites I spend two hours at the very most on. The least can range from five to fifteen minutes.

Another reason I want to breakup with Facebook is that, quite frankly, I am sick and tired of reading about and seeing people's life stories, their issues, their opinions that no one asked for, and their private/intimate lives that few people truly care about.

Hate me and call me cynical, but in all honesty your opinion about how something is wrong and the whole world is going to crap because of it is just clogging my feed and making my eyes twitch.

 
Sorry, I just got a little ranty. My apologies. And I am aware that my opinion could be seen as hypocritical since I have Twitter and this blog. Let me explain myself.
 
Blogs are meant to be long-winded and kind of personal. Not who you're sleeping with or why you hate so-and-so, but personal as in you give general, nonspecific info about your life. Most blogs are made because the blogger believes he/she has something to say; most people who read blogs want to hear what the author has to say. (If you want to promote a charity or inspiring story on Facebook, that's way different and I don't find that irritating.)Twitter, on the other hand, is supposed to be personable but in a different way. You can only give snippets of your thoughts and life story. If you write ten tweets describing your issue, no one is going to care; no one is going to scroll scroll scroll to read ten different tweets.
 
And that is why I like Twitter more. If I really want to know about someone's life, I can look him/her up on Facebook or his/her website. I do not feel like I am being forced to read something. I want snippets, not full-fledge stories--I read novels for those. I know I can unfollow people, but if I did that I wouldn't really have anything on my feed. Which sounds like my goal, but if I delete my Facebook, I know I will lose contact with several friends I do not see more than once a year and I will be left out in the cold for get-together and events; mass texts to plan a movie night etc is just a pain and greatly inefficient. See my dilemma?
 
I suppose I could look up as many friends as I can on Twitter, but so far when I ask my friends for their Twitter, they ignore me or say "Oh, I never go on there." Even with the direct messaging, my social group is way more into Instagram and Facebook than Twitter--it's super frustrating!
 
The only reason I am still on Facebook is for the reasons above: I need some way to know what is happening and where I should be and what time on a Friday night. In reality, I just want to abandon Facebook and never look back. Will I? Probably not. My consolation is that I cannot be the only one who wants to abandon a social media site but feels the irritating need to remain for her social life.



Saturday, November 7, 2015

Games Are Not My Thing

In Jenkins article about media education (I think everyone knows what I'm talking about by now), he states "Gamers may be acquiring some of these distributed cognition skills through their participation in squadron-based video game" (37). After watching a TED talk about how gaming can improve the world and develop the next leaders of the world, and reading in Jenkin's distributed cognition section, I can certainly believe that games can be beneficial to the world. There's just one problem:

I don't play video games.

 
I did not grow up playing video games or even computer games a lot. When it comes to playing either one, I am super incompetent.

 
I've tried, believe me, I've tried but I just end up embarrassing myself and those playing with me. It could be my lack of experience--and natural talent-- but I'm just not good at video games. To avoid mortification, I just don't play them.
 
 
Yes, yes, I know. It's the coward's way out. I should pick myself up and force myself to learn. But games are expensive and truthfully, I don't have the motivation to spend time to learn them--no offense to gamers. I admire your skill, I really do. Still, I think there are other ways to gain the skills distributed cognition has to offer. For example, learning how to build websites, participating in online writing communities, collaborating with a friend on a blog, networking over social media, and utilizing as much technology as possible provided in your workplace or school.
 
Those are just my thoughts. This was a quickie because my week has been a wreck and I don't know what else to say. So, game on gamers and be creative nongamers. Good luck all!


Wednesday, November 4, 2015

I Was Born This Way . . . Maybe

In the article, Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century, Henry Jenkins discusses the several skills that educators have deemed important in order for students to understand media and how to use it. My classmates and I were all assigned a skill; mine is distributed cognition. At first hearing, it sounded super complicated and scholarly-- something I could handle but didn't want to. When I read about it in Jenkins article, I discovered it is quite interesting and isn't very complicated at all. Professor, sorry for doubting you.

Distributed cognition is "the ability to interact meaningfully with tools that expand our mental capacities" (Jenkins 37). In other words, it is using the tools we have in our lives, such as computers, calculators, refrigerators, etc. to expand our knowledge and intelligence. Jenkins cites a few educators who emphasize that technologies can help out our brains instead of hinder them; he writes that since they claim that technologies are actually a part of our thinking process, then "it makes no sense to “factor out" what the human brain is doing as the “real” part of thinking, and to view what the technology is doing as a “cheat” or “crutch"" (37).  Take that grade school math teachers who said I couldn't use a calculator!

There was one thing in this article that really got my attention. Jenkins cites Pea, who wrote that "intelligence is accomplished rather than possessed" (37). I believed it from the beginning, but then I really got to thinking:
 
We're raised to believe that the amount of smart in our brains that we're born with is what we get for life. But . . . what if that isn't true? Think about it. We know very little when we're born; in fact, we don't know much about the world until we get to the high school, and even then we still have a LOT to figure out. We aren't labelled "dumb", "smart", "intelligent", or "genius" until we're in school. And we only get labelled one of those until information is put before us and we are required to learn it. From what Jenkins writes, it sounds like intelligence is our ability to learn something new-- that's also what Google says when I searched for its definition. If we catch on quickly and retain that info, then we are smart. If we struggle or fail completely to grasp something, then we are dumb.
 
This can be expanded into how we speak of technology literacy. It is a new skill unique to the 21st century. Never before has literacy of new technology and media been so essential to living in the modern world. Never before has there been a difference between someone being just "smart" and "computer smart". There are many, many people (mainly of older generations) that are technologically illiterate or at least struggle to understand and utilize it when otherwise they are extremely intelligent and even border on genius.
 
I think we're beginning to associate intelligence with how well you can work technology and how much you can do with it. I don't believe that's good. Perhaps not the most terrible thing in the world, but not great, either We could miss out on a lot of incredibly intelligent people in our businesses, school, government, and culture if we disregard someone just because they don't understand Tumblr.
 
Should we encourage these struggling computer readers? Yes! As Jenkins writes, "a classroom designed to foster distributed cognition encourages students to participate with a range of people, artifacts, and devices" (39) is one way to begin with young generations. With older users, it might just be sitting down with them and going over how this or that functions until they get it. You know what they say, anyways: you don't really know something until you've taught it to someone else.
 
I do believe that we are born with a certain amount of intelligence, but it is expanded and developed throughout our lives depending on what we learn and what we do or do not apply.
 
Bibliography: Jenkins, Henry. "Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century." (2006): 37-39. Web. 4 Nov. 2015.



Friday, October 30, 2015

Please Don't Call Me

Though Chapter 8: Writing on Screen in Baron's A Better Pencil had may great things to say, the point that caught the most of my attention would have to be when he wrote about Rudy Giuliana, a 2008 presidential candidate. This politician answered his wife's phone call-- while he was giving a speech to the NRA. Might sound strange, but Baron writes that "what was most amusing about the incident was just how ordinary it seemed to everyone in the audience" (137). Giuliana was not ridiculed by anyone in the audience and Baron does not state if he was criticized by the public.

This got me thinking about texting, which is probably the most common digital writing in the world. Everywhere you go, there is someone texting or reading a text. Walking on campus there are few students gazing at the changing leaves on the trees; they're staring at their phones. While I do not text as much as most of my peers, I believe, I do have my nose in my phone quite a lot. Sometimes it is legitimate for me to read a text and text back while I'm walking or with friends, but others times I'm just fiddling.

Older generations, though many members have joined the texting revolution, worry about millennials and generations after them. They refer to instances such as these:


 

 
 
 
 These are rather funny, especially since all of us are guilty of them and it is mainly our pride that is hurt when we do these things. Even so, people have been hit when crossing the street when it wasn't safe because they weren't paying attention, and that isn't funny. I'm not going to preach that you shouldn't try to cross the street while texting, because we've all heard every warning from our parents or other concerned elders. As much as we youth want to roll our eyes at them, there are definitely issues.

What I really want to talk about is the word Baron used: "ordinary". It is not ordinary to actually call a friend now. It is ordinary for somebody to be texting in class, to answer a text while speaking with friends, texting at work, and I have even heard of people texting while in interviews.

 
I mean, just take a look in our class. We all have our laptops or phones or both out while our professor is speaking. What's even crazier is that he doesn't care. Even during presentations we're scrolling through Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram--I do it too. And it's ordinary and almost not even seen as disrespectful as it was a few years ago because it's the norm. I might feel some guilt over paying more attention to Facebook instead of what my professor says, but then I look around the room and see everyone else doing the same, so I just shrug and continue.
 
I'm not calling out anyone or trying to demonize our generation and the generations after us, I am merely trying to bring attention to something. I am stating my opinion. Which is that maybe we should put our phones away a little more often; maybe we should step into a corner to answer a text instead of marching down a hallway full of students with our minds on the words we're typing. There is nothing wrong with texting, but when you do it while driving (yes, I am bringing that up), running, or even crossing the street, you are putting not just yourself at risk, but others too. Besides, if your eyes are trained on a screen, you may miss something or someone who will change your life. Take a look at this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2Hgvw-CMUQ it's short and sweet.
 
Sources: Baron, Dennis E. "Writing On Screen." A Better Pencil Readers, Writers, and the Digital Revolution. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009. Print. 
 
I made the gifs from these:
 
 
 
 

 

Wednesday, October 28, 2015

High School and Beyond

High school might be the only hell a person believes in, but at least it teaches us a lot--right? Most college students are still waiting to use the algebra they were forced to learn and the poems they were forced to read in their everyday lives or even on occasion. Many agree that it would have been nice to know how to do taxes, what a mortgage is, how to balance a check book, and much more. I would have liked to know all of that before I became an "adult", but I also would have liked to know that all the time I spent online learning how to write and connect within fandom communities and how to post things that got attention would open doors for me. I would have liked to have been encouraged to express my creativity on the internet instead of being made ashamed that I spent my down time online; I would have liked to have known that I could make a career on the internet doing something I enjoyed.

Okay, so maybe I'm just a teeny bit bitter. Still, it would have been great to have been taught how my fondness for technology would help me someday possibly get a job. In my high school we got iPads my last two years. You know what we used them for?

NOTHING. Other than email and to look up the answers we couldn't find in our textbooks, we used them for nothing. We were supposed to use them to access digital textbooks. The only textbook I had digitally for those entire two years was my algebra book and since I hate math, I basically hated it. It is important to point out that the years I was in high school, eBooks and digital learning was just becoming a thing. Therefore, it wasn't really my school's--and certainly not my teachers'-- fault we had technology we couldn't "properly" use.

What I did enjoy about the iPad was that I had finally found my people and place. I didn't participate a lot, but as Henry Jenkins writes in his article, Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century, about participatory culture online, "not every member must contribute, but all must believe they are free to contribute when ready and that what they contribute will be appropriately valued" (7). That is one thing I appreciated about online communities: there was little pressure to contribute, unlike high school. If I didn't participate in high school other than class, I wasn't well-rounded, ambitious, or social.

 
If there is one thing in high school we all love but some days can't stand, it would be parents. I would venture to claim that they can be even more irritating when it comes to their involvement with us millennials and our online lives. It isn't their fault really because they grew up much, much differently. Still, in high school and now in college, my parents hadn't a clue about online communities, networks, and all the opportunities for my future. And they certainly have a right to be worried about the dangerous elements of the internet. I do not doubt that all of the millennials reading this have been asked by their parents why they spend so much time in front of the computer:

"It'll ruin your eyes staring at a screen for so long."

"Why are you wasting your time on there? There is nothing of much value on the internet unless your doing research."

"Online friends are not real friends; they're probably predators."

"What are you looking up? You are not on porn sites are you?!"

"Go have fun in the great outdoors."

 


 Don't get me wrong, I love my parents and there were days I was completely unproductive on the internet. Even so, I think it would have done greater good--or at least no harm--for my parents to ask out of curiosity instead of fear and suspicion what I was spending so much of time. Especially now. I've become much more confident online and I have made a small audience on all of my media platforms. I network and learn something new everyday that helps me have a greater presence. My career as an artist, or "media creator" as Jenkins calls it (6), has begun and I plan to continue to grow it. No surprise then that I spend more time on my laptop and the internet than I ever have. And a little shocking but at the same not shocking that my parents still don't get any of it.
 
This leads me to Jenkins claim that "schools, afterschool programs, and parents have distinctive roles to play as they do what they can in their own spaces to encourage and nurture these skills" (4). These skills meaning multitasking; rapid, clear decision making; connect and work with people of diverse backgrounds; and "navigating information landscapes" (10). I am learning those skills in college. I am behind high schoolers of today and while that isn't a crisis, I think it's important to support people of all ages, but especially those in school, in their online endeavors. I hope grade schools and high schools will spend more time teaching kids how to create and benefit from their online innovations instead of scolding them for spending time on something useless. I hope schools will encourage growth in participatory culture and include them in their curriculum. Of course, schools should also teach caution and safety online--just not in the way that scares kids and parents away; in ways that teach kids how to think before they post something and how to learn from experiences, which Jenkins also speaks about.
 
Take this opinion of mine with a grain of salt. I am not an educator and I do not plan on being a parent for a long time. So, this is merely my thoughts because I like my voice being heard.
 
Bibliography: Jenkins, Henry. "Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Centur." (2006): 3-18. Web. 27 Oct. 2015.






Monday, October 26, 2015

Who Do You Trust?

In A Better Pencil, Chapter 7: Trust the Text, Dennis Baron discusses how society has evolved from distrusting anything written down to trusting nothing unless it is written down. I certainly believe this. If I read an article myself instead of just getting the rundown of it from a friend orally, I am more likely to trust the actual article than the words coming out of my friend's mouth (whether or not that says something about my relationships, I don't know). If I do not fully understand or think that what my friend claims is accurate, then I will look up the article and see for myself.

Baron has something that I disagree strongly, however: "while a handwritten text is as valid, legally, as anything typed or printed, today we are more likely to accept the writing of strangers if it's machine generated" (131).

This is not at all true for me. As Baron points out, it is much easier to forge something digitally than manually. He uses the example of photoshop, stating "computers allow us to manipulate images in ways that make forgery undetectable" (117) and "it's easy enough for an amateur to produce a fraudulent document, even a complex one, on a computer" (118). For me, I am much more likely to be skeptical over something on the internet than in my grandmother's chest in the attic. The reason for this is that it is more difficult to forge by hand. You have to be extremely skilled to paint a replica of the Mona Lisa that looks nearly undiscernibly like the original. As for handwriting, most people do not pay much attention to each other's. Even so, it is difficult to write the same exact way as someone else. Typed words look all the same; there aren't any loops, certain letters that connect, varying spaces, or anything else quirky and unique as an individual's handwriting.

 
Of course, this does not mean that everything handwritten is reliable-- quite the contrary.
"We still run into handwritten texts that may not record the past as it really is" (Baron 130).
You don't have to look deep into history to realize that many documents, even those written by those who experienced an event first hand, are littered with sexism, racism, ethnocentrism, ignorance, prejudice, limited knowledge of scientific fact, and much more. These documents do, however, teach us something about the time in which the author lived. That does not mean they are accurate, though. Baron is correct is claiming that handwriting can be deceiving, but I personally do not trust typed and/or printed documents over handwritten.
 
Here are some reasons (some of which I have already listed)
  • It is much more difficult to copy another's handwriting precisely enough that professionals will not detect the forgery.
  • When people write things down, they are doing so to say something. Facts can be checked. This, of course, can also be a downfall since lies abound on the internet.
  • While the content of a document might be biased, it can reveal a lot about the "truths" of the time in which it was written.
  • The "truths" of that time might be seen as obvious lies today, but in the historical period they are accounts of how people thought and what they believed. In regards to society's beliefs, structure, and worldview, this makes the document accurate.
So there's my spiel. Hope I got you thinking!
 
Bibliography: Baron, Dennis E. "Trusting the Text." A Better Pencil Readers, Writers, and the Digital Revolution. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009. 113- 134. Print.  

Friday, October 23, 2015

My Wheelhouse

Henry Jenkins article, Why Heather Can Write, is right in my wheelhouse. Fandom and fanfiction are two of my favorite things--don't worry, I'm not one of those fangirls who kidnaps the artists she loves.

I loved the entire article, but I mainly liked how the students proved that something "adults" render trivial and immature can be quite beneficial.
Wait, what? Do my eyes deceive me? I mean, a scholar said that social media and digital writing is good, so it must be.


Do you know how much this would have helped me in high school? If I had known there were online writing communities as some of the students in the article are a part of--with a community I could write, edit, publish, and learn with--I may be more skilled and farther along in my writing career. I knew of Wattpad, but I didn't have the guts to write anything on it until college.

I also loved how the article proved that books are not dying out. Have you heard of this? With the wave of new reading technology such as eBooks and Kindles a few years ago, publishers and older generations were freaking out. They believed that the book industry as we know it would die out. Well, the world proved them wrong--big time. If anything, reading and book access has increased. In addition, there are more opportunities than ever for budding writers because of technology: self-publishing the "traditional" way through Amazon, for example; writing fanfiction on Wattpad or other sites; Nanowrimo; writing on social media; and many others. Some wish that we could go back to good old days where only solid books were published and writers were made after years and years of turmoil. Hate to disappoint, but digital writing, fanfiction, and young thriving authors are here to stay.

And, I would just like to add, there is no shame in writing fanfiction or being heavily involved in an online writing community. This article proved it can be great! Go nuts!

Wednesday, October 21, 2015

Sounds Interesting

So, my classmates and I had to pick a career and google it. The two options we had were Content Strategist or Experience Architect, which are apparently two careers English majors and the like are qualified for. I chose Experience Architect. This is how my exploration went.

Brainstorming about what it might be:


 
Reading on Wikipedia what it is:
 
Investigating further:
 
Then I thought about it some more and came to this conclusion:
 
Honestly though, this career sounds like a millennial's dream. I looked at a few different websites, some of them academic, and they pretty much all said the same thing: experience architects use all sorts of different mediums in order to create satisfying, creative, and significant experiences for customers/users. According to Tom Kelley, author of The Art of Innovation, 
 
"The Experience Architect is that person relentlessly focused on creating remarkable individual experiences. This person facilitates positive encounters with your organization through products, services, digital interactions, spaces, or events."
 
Basically, they can, according to Michigan State University's College of Arts & Letters, have "many types of careers in XA, including user experience architects, interaction designers, information architects, usability specialists, content strategists, visual designers, and web developers".  If you are a student at Michigan Sate, you will study "writing, design, philosophy, and computer science". How cool is that? You can be a book nerd and a techie!
 
While the careers listed above are not anything I want (not that I know of), I would definitely love to be able to use my writing and technology to create a memorable experience for another person. In a sense, that is already a reason I am an English major and want to be a writer; I want to inspire people and get them thinking while also enjoying themselves.
 
 
Sources:
 
Michigan State University: http://xa.cal.msu.edu/xa/
 
 
 
 
 
 

Monday, October 19, 2015

Guys, I Just Joined Tumblr

I broke. After several years of evading the temptation, I gave in and made a Tumblr account. The only popular social media account I do not have is Reddit, and I will NEVER get that. The main reason being I do not need and cannot have any more distractions.

Anyways, I joined Tumblr and . . . I'm a little nervous. I mainly joined so I could follow some blogs and join in fandom community (aka, rabbit holes that never see the light of day). So, the reasons aren't terrible. But I'm still nervous. I mean, I don't even know how to work Tumblr. I get the general idea from carefully observing far, far away through Pinterest and links, but actually make a blog and connect? Uh, that would be a no.



Newbie butterflies are not the only thing that have me wringing my hands. When I was signing up, Tumblr suggested a username. I already had one picked out, but the site seemed to think I'd benefit from something more . . . shall we say, high schooley and hardcore fangirl/fanboyish. I love nerds and fangirls--I'm one of them--but I'm not in high school and I prefer not to sound like a teen. I like teens, but I'm not one of them and I am glad that I am no longer one. Plus, I want to make my blog, ahem, a little more professional. Is that ludicrous? I feel like I just said something absolutely absurd. What I mean by professional is not like a work blog made by a CEO, rather, a blog that is polished and that I would not be mortified to have a future employer to look at. I am not ashamed of being a nerd, but I prefer not to seem like an immature twenty-something with nothing to do but browse Tumblr all day.

Another reason is the same question I've had for every social media account I have: how do I get people to follow me and how do I become known? I mean, I'm great at freaking out over awesome stuff strangers put on the internet, but I'm not so sure I elicit the same reaction from people looking at my accounts. I have an idea of what I wish my blog to be about and the audience it might draw, but I'm not certain. Honestly, how to you get people to like you?

One more reason I'm nervous is that I'll fall down a rabbit hole, then another, then another and another until there is no hope of getting out. When I first started Pinterest, I went down a few rabbit holes. The moment I got out, I felt like a vampire (NOT the Twilight ones) going out into the sun; I asked myself what day it was. When I logged out, Tumblr had a little pop up that said "Sign up! You'll never be bored again." That's what I'm afraid of! It took nearly a month for me to get bored on Pinterest; a month before I could sign out without feeling like I was missing out on something. How long will it take me to get bored on Tumblr?

Good Lord, I think I need help.

Despite my worries, I am excited. No really, I am. I am excited to meet new people and have another audience and be part of another audience. I just have to make sure I don't get too close to the edge of a black hole and I got my discipline cap on. So, without further ado

Saturday, October 17, 2015

When to Lie

It's been a week since my class watched Citizen Four, but it is still in my mind--vaguely, not freshly. I was struggling to come up with what to write for a post, when an awesome classmate (hi Natalie!) recommended I do another on Citizen Four. Well, here we are! I went back to Twitter to see if I could respond to some tweets we did on the movie. Shamefully, I'm going to respond to one of my own tweets.

This was one of my first tweets, and it was made the first week we watched Citizen Four. It says, "The judges look so unimpressed", referring to the scenes where the NSA director is being interrogated. He blatantly lies to the judges over and over again when asked if he and other members of the NSA were aware and if they were than why didn't they do anything. The judges he was lying to, meanwhile, looked completely, utterly, and absolutely unimpressed. The director continued to try and pull a fast one on the judges, much like someone who makes a joke that isn't obviously racist in a diverse room but turns out to be the only one to laugh.

 
Honestly, how dumb does he think those judges are? I don't even have a college degree yet and I could tell just from his rhetoric and body language he was lying.
 
Anyways, this got me thinking about lying on the internet. It's more difficult, I believe, to lie in the real world (the world outside of the internet) than on the web. For one, on the web you can choose pseudonyms and, usually you are encouraged to. It is safer. Unless you want to make a professional presence on the web, you shouldn't give out a full name (except on Facebook). Two, you can hide behind an endless supply of false info that can support your lie. Google and Wikipedia have some good sources, but there is a TON of crap out there too. Often, people who suspect you might be lying are too lazy to really investigate and put your claim through a fact check (I am one of those people). Three, and possibly the largest reason, you are just one liar out of millions. 
 
It could be said that everyone is somewhat of a liar on the internet. It's not a secret that most of us put on a different mask--or take one off--when we log on to Twitter, Instagram, or Facebook. Most of us make our lives appear like one big adventure. In reality, we're ordinary people with completely normal lives devoid of swashbuckling adventures. Unfortunately.
 
 
I suppose the question is, though, is it bad to lie so much on the internet? It was stupid and a crime for the NSA director to lie under oath, but what about the rest of us who just want to have fun on social media? I think it's alright to have a pseudonym: it's for safety, not to be deceitful. The last thing you want is to meet a creeper online. What I do NOT think is okay is to lie about serious things, such as global warming, refugee crises, wars, and other terrible things that happen in reality. You can be snarky or ironic--heck, I'm those all the time. But to say that there really aren't any refugees from Syria and other Middle Eastern countries and that it's not really a crisis, well, sorry (not sorry), but I do not like people like you. And I will not listen to you.
 
Sadly, some people will, and this can create problems. Denying something like the refugee crisis is like denying the Holocaust ever happened. It's wrong. It downplays a serious issue that must be addressed and continued to be addressed until it is resolved. I'm not saying you have to donate half your income to charity or fly overseas to help (please don't do this unless you have special training); I am only asking to spread the truthful word around. That's all!
 
Whoa. That got really serious and a little ranty. My apologies. I leave you to your thinking that hopefully I initiated.
 
 
 
 


Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Type, Type, Type

It took me thirty minutes to come up with a topic--until I thought, Oh wait. I can read another's blog and come up with an idea! I mentally patted myself on the back. So, I read Tarah's blog post, "Learning to Write" (link below). It was perfect for sparking ideas!

Tarah wrote that she never liked how writing, especially typing, was taught in school. I have to agree. Tarah wrote that she enjoyed handwriting, which I did to, however . . . Learning cursive was fun, though it has proved to be obsolete. By the time you reach high school, most people either do a combination of cursive and print, or just print. I do the former. I could use cursive only, but I'm not going to. It would take too long to write anything and would not look pretty.

I am all the way with her, though, on how schools teach typing. At least, how it was taught a few years ago. Education is rather slow to change, so it would not be shocking if they still did. Anyways, basically, how schools taught typing was just repeat and repeat typing the same words or nonwords under a timer.



For me, at least, learning something with the seconds ticking by before the horrific alarm sounded taught me nothing except that:

 
I did not think that for long, but when all of your friends are typing way more words than you, it feels like you can't do anything right. I suppose what I'm trying to show and agree with Tarah in is that learning to write--in any medium-- should not be painful. It should be fun.
 
I believe it can be more fun, specifically because the internet is a lot better now than what it was when I was in grade school. Dial-up, I will never, ever miss you.
 
I am not going to college to be a teacher of any sort. I don't have any plans to be an official educator, and I also do not want to sound like a snob or that I know it all. I just have some thoughts on how learning to write, as a child or adult, can be fun and exciting.
 
One, whether a teacher of grade school kids or someone in college and older who wants to type quicker and effectively, get into social media! It can be scary and downright perilous, but go with caution, do not post what you would not want your grandmother to see, and you'll learn tons. Two, take your time. Do not rush typing. You'll end up with more red lines that haunt you than actually how to type quickly. You need to start slow. When I first began tweeting, I had to think long and hard about what I posted. In not too long a while, I learned what got reactions and what was ignored, and what I liked to write about. Three, and this is the last one, I swear: just type! Practice on Word, social media--heck, even writing something in the comments section is writing.
 
Learning to write for the first time is a huge step in life, but we never stop learning. The internet has provided more opportunities that are much more fun and possibly effective than the traditional method, so use them!
 

Friday, October 9, 2015

What's Snowden Up To?

Like most people who at least skim news headlines, I heard about Snowden and the NSA scandal. I did not investigate it very much; I hardly read any articles. But I knew it was bad; the NSA freaked out, citizens of the US and other countries brought out their pitchforks, and Edward Snowden, the man who started it all, was either hailed as a whistleblower hero or despised as a traitor. Personally, I saw him (and still do) as the former. That's not to say there are not some security concerns with his huge revelation. In general, however, I think most people agree that at the very least, he did a good thing.

Like most news and national/international crises, the NSA scandal and Snowden's heroism/notoriety faded. Anxiety and anger lingered, but for the average citizen the issues of privacy and gov't surveillance were pushed aside for more immediate issues. Whether you see that as acceptable and natural, or just plain foolish, that's up to you.

Until recently, I had not heard much of anything else about Snowden. I frequently heard things about privacy and the corruption of gov't institutions, except not about the NSA or it's whistleblower. Like most people, I preferred to not acknowledge that our gov't was slimy sometimes. Then, I took a class that centers on the digital age, with a heavy focus on writing online and social media. It's only natural that Snowden and the NSA would come up: we made Twitter accounts and blogs that can be viewed by anyone. Even before the class, most of us were already active on social media. It brought up a lot of questions about what we post online and the effects it may have us in our offline lives.

To really bring home the conflict between privacy as a right and gov't spying as essential to national security, we watched Citizen Four. I was disturbed when I heard about the scandal and skimmed articles, but this movie kind of terrified me. Despite the fear and anger I felt, I kept mentally giving a thumbs up to Snowden for what he did. Still, there was the question of, "Where is he now?"

The answer is in Russia, on Twitter. Half of the stuff I saw on his Twitter feed I did not understand. Or, I got the gist of but couldn't find the interest to actually investigate further. In general, Snowden tweets about gov't corruption, privacy issues, and free internet. One article I found that he retweeted, "Social Media Self-Defense" by Ella Armageddon on the blog Totally Not Malware, sparked my interest.

In this brief but very informative article, I found one of the things that I believe Snowden would like us to take away from Citizen Four and his whistleblowing: take precautions on the internet to protect your privacy before it can be stolen. That's not to say that every innocent thing you post will be used against you, or that you have nothing to worry about if you are really, super careful. But, at the very least, it is less likely something will be used against you if you follow some of the advice in the article.

Some of the advice includes using passwords that even your soulmate would have trouble figuring out; be very aware of the pictures you post; do not put the same information on every account if you do not want others to make connections between the different accounts; and for the love of God (my words), do not get cocky and be discreet. From Rob Ford to Michael Phelps, arrogance in and disrespect for sketchy situations evidenced on social media has brought more than one reputation and career crashing down.

It seems like Snowden is still trying to be the champion of the people's privacy. He follows the NSA on Twitter and tweets about serious issues that should be discussed and recognized more. So, what's Snowden up to? Defending privacy rights of the people and demanding transparency of institutions.

Here's the link to the Self-Defense artilcle: http://blog.totallynotmalware.net/?p=15

Thursday, October 8, 2015

What Started It All

This is going to be a bit of a cheesy post. The main reason being that it's going to be me mainly claiming how wonderful the internet is and how it had helped my life in a positive manner. As if no one's already sung the praises of the internet or how it changed their life.

My class was asked to write, in relation to Kathleen Blake Yancey's Writing in the 21st Century, what impacted our writing life positively. There was no specification to whether it was writing digitally or not. My "inspiration" that I am going to write about is one of many, but it can easily be related to Yancey's article. Ready?

I had just become an English major and was very much in love with the discipline (I still am). Most of my classes were part of my major, but there was not a whole lot of writing--specifically creative writing, which I was dying to do and share my work with others and read their work, too. Long before I was an English major, I was a book nerd.

 
So I knew a thing or two about not just the book world, but the publishing industry and the craft of writing. I knew enough that I realized that if I ever wanted to become an author myself (among other bookish things), I needed to get my work critiqued. Where did I go? Drumroll please . . .
 
 
Shocker, right? I searched on the amazing internet and guess what I found? A wonderful writing group just out of town! I contacted them by email and wala! A response came within two days and the next week I entered a room and became part of the group. The people were kind, experienced but still very willing to learn more, excited I was there, and quite versatile.
 
Despite all of the members being a whole generation ahead of me, they had different mediums they wrote, edited, and read on. When a member wanted to submit a work, the leader of the work sent the entire piece to all the members by email. To critique, we could either edit on Word using track changes, or we could print out hard copies and mark up the piece in actual pen. I chose to read on my laptop then print out a copy and mark it up with pen.
 
The truth is, as I'm sure you've already realized, that the easy contact between members of the group and the amount of writing we can bring to a polished end was greatly impacted by the use of the internet and digital writing. Without Word or another word processing program, we could not so easily and quickly share our work and critique it; we would have to wait to meet every other week to exchange work. And considering I had no idea this group existed until I googled for one, I never would have found a writing group. Okay, maybe I would have, but the internet made it much, much quicker and less stressful.
 
I've learned a lot since joining this group; including what format to write and edit in works best for me as an individual. I fiddled with writing a rough draft by hand; I used track changes for a while to critique; and I rewrote a story by hand without touching a keyboard after revising the same draft on my laptop. I also came to appreciate the different ways people write. I learned how to accommodate their preferences, such as if a member preferred a hard copy so she could pour over a draft without having to stare at a screen or be distracted by the internet.
 
Being in a writing group helped my writing and interactions with other writers in ways I never would have learned by remaining by myself in my room. As Yancey writes of this new age of digital writing, "we are writing to share, yes; to encourage dialogue, perhaps; but mostly, I think, to participate" (5). I want to share my work and read others, then discuss the writing, but I also want to feel I am not so alone in this frightening endeavor we call writing. The writing group I am part of has encouraged me in my writing while helping me hone it by sharing my work and other digitally and then discussing it through email and face-to-face.
 
There is no right or wrong way to write. There is no best way to write that first rough draft, edit that third draft, or publish your polished, perfect final text. All you have to do is write. On a computer, a blank notebook, amongst your class notes, or grocery lists. Just write! With a group, by yourself, or near other people but not collaborating. Just write! By tweet, fanfiction, novel, poem, or short story. Just write! 
 
 
 I found the best way to write for me (I think, anyways). The best way for you to write may be completely different, and that is great. Just freakin' write and see where it goes. You'll learn a lot.
 
P.S: If you want to know what writing group I am part of, send me a direct message on Twitter https://twitter.com/dreamwrit
 
Bibliography: Yancey, Kathleen Blake. Writing in the 21st Century. Rep. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English, 2009. Print.